![]() The only exception may be mega threads at certain times of the year that will only be posted by mods. ![]() Scorecard posts are only allowed to be posted on Saturdays for exceptional games, or to showcase rare in-game moments.Īll lootbox, container and bundle results are prohibited, paid or free. In this subreddit we share World of Warships news, strategy, tips, discussions and other content, as well as sharing our passion for historical warships. We're Redditors with a passion for warships, gaming and the World of Warships video game on PC. That would be a much bigger deal in my opinion than the extra armor on the frontal bulkhead and be a proper explanation as to why many people say that the Missouri is much tankier than the Iowa: shells that would otherwise cause penetration damage now bounce off doing none.Please mark leaks with spoiler tags, like this: Smolensk is balanced!. The Missouri on the other hand has the ability to bounce those shots using nothing but the exterior armor, or barring that, the armor will at least be taken into consideration and reduce the penetration of the shell before it hits the belt armor. If that's true, and that's what I'm inclined to believe, if a battleship hits you anywhere other than the top section in the Iowa, you're guaranteed to take penetration damage and are wholly reliant on your belt armor to avoid anything more than that. Same concept as Iowa bow armor, if overmatched whether or not the ship will be citadelled depends on whether the shell pen roll is enough to pen the forward citadel plate. ![]() ![]() You dont add them together, the overmatch is rolled seperately for each armor layer. It counts as a separate armor layer that acts independently of the lateral citadel armor. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |